THE STARCHILD RESEARCH
Amy Vickers, Nov 2006
The Starchild Skull was recently featured in a National Geographic Channel documentary titled "Ancient Astronauts," a part of the "Is It Real?" series. Click to read a rebuttal by Lloyd Pye.
The program briefly mentioned the main anomalous features of the
Starchild skull, then presented forensic anthropologist, Dr. William Rodriguez
III, who compared the skull to an otherwise healthy human skull
with abnormal parietal bossing (expansion of the parietal bones). Dr. Rodriguez
asserted that the similarity in the parietal areas of the two skulls, the
Starchild must represent an explainable human deformity [1]. This, however,
fails to account for the myriad other abnormalities of the Starchild Skull.
The table below gives a summary comparison of the main characteristics of the Starchild Skull (SC) and a skull with abnormal parietal bossing (PB) like the one presented by Dr. Rodriguez, followed by a series of photographs showing direct comparisons of the two. Scroll down to view all evidence, or click in the table to jump to the points that interest you. The evidence presented below clearly shows that, while the abnormal human skull does have an unusual shape, it is not the shape of the Starchild. In addition, the abnormal skull appears to have otherwise normal eye-sockets, bone thickness, facial shape, and cranial formation, while the same cannot be said for the Starchild [2]. While we respect Dr. Rodriguez's professional opinion, examination of all aspects of the skulls proves that that the parietal bossing of the skull he presented does not truly resemble the parietal bossing evident in the Starchild, and in no way explains or accounts for the other abnormal aspects of the skull.
|
Starchild Skull |
Skull with Abnormal Parietal Bossing |
|
| Has orbital cavities (eye sockets) half of normal depth [3]. | Has normal eye sockets. | Show Me |
| Has bone uniformly half as thick [4], and weighing half as much as a normal skull of corresponding size [5]. | Has bone within the ranges of normal thickness and weight. | Show Me |
| Has abnormally small zygomatic (cheek bone) attachments [6]. | Has normal zygomatic processes. | Show Me |
| Has optic foramens positioned nearly an inch lower than normal [7]. | Has optic foramens positioned in normal location in the centre and deepest point of the socket. | Show Me |
| Has no brow ridges [8]. | Has normal brow ridges. | Show Me |
| Has expanded parietals [9]. | Has expanded parietals. | Show Me |
| Has an abnormal indentation running along the saggital suture, not caused by premature fusion of the suture [10]. | Has a normal rounded crown. | Show Me |
| Has a flattened occipital that slants toward the foramen magnum (neck opening) at a severe angle, not caused by artificial deformation [11]. | Has a normal occipital that rounds in a typical fashion toward the foramen magnum opening. | Show Me |
| Has no inion, and in fact has a "slight fossa" (depression) where the inion should be [12]. | Has a normal inion. | Show Me |
| Has a substantially abnormal overall shape [13] | Has a normal shape with the exception of the parietals. | Show Me |
For more information about the abnormal shape and composition of the Starchild Skull, please peruse the website. We suggest you begin with "What is the Starchild?"
There are 8 bones externally visible on a human skull: the frontal bone, two temporal bones, two parietals, the occipital, the two external surfaces of the sphenoid, and two external surfaces of the ethmodial bone [14]. In addition there are the internal bones: the sections of the ethmodial behind the nasal bone and between the eye sockets [15], the internal sections of the sphenoid [16], and the six inner ear bones, or "auditory ossicles" inside the temporal bone [17]. Also, the 14 bones that make up the face: two nasal bones, two lacrimals, two zygomatics, two palatines, two inferior nasal conchæ, the vomer, the two bones of the maxilla, and the mandible (lower jaw) [18]. The Starchild is missing most of the facial bones, and both skulls are presented without mandibles.
Below is a series of photographs of the Starchild skull (SC) compared to a skull with abnormal parietal bossing (PB), which is either the same skull, or a skull very similar to, the one presented by Dr. Rodriguez in the National Geographic Documentary.
SC's orbits (eye sockets) are half normal depth [19], while PB's orbits appear to be of normal depth. The two skulls are sitting side-by-side, so an accurate size comparison can be made. Note that SC is somewhat wider than PB. SC's bone is uniformly half as thick, and half as heavy as normal human bone [20], while PB's bone falls within normal parameters in all ways. Again it should be mentioned that most of SC's facial bones are missing, however, from the remaining bones we are able to determine that it had facial features about half normal size, with small cheekbones (shown below), and a jaw about half normal size [21]. PB's facial features fall well within the normal size range.
Underside view of both skulls showing reconstruction of SC's zygomatic
(cheek) bones (left), in comparison to PB's zygomatic bones (right).
As can be seen above, and as noted by Dr. Ted Robinson, SC's zygomatic processes are about 50% smaller than normal, and arch off the face less than half an inch, as opposed to the normal arching out about three-quarters of a inch from the maxilla [22]. PB has normal zygomatic bones.
Close up view of orbits (eye sockets) of both skulls showing the position of
the optic foramens.
SC's optic foramens, the holes in the orbits through which blood vessels and nerves pass, are nearly an inch lower than they should be, situated at the bottom of the orbit, rather than the centre [23]. PB's optic foramens appear to be situated in their normal position, at the central, deepest part of the orbit. Also note that SC has no brow ridges[24] (the superciliary arches of the frontal bone [25]), compared to the normal brow ridges exhibited by PB.
Top view of Starchild (left) and skull with parietal bossing (right)
This is
a view of both skulls from the
top looking down. The top of a normal adult human skull is divided into three
parts, the frontal bone which makes up the front part of the skull and attaches
to the face, and the two parietal bones that make up the back of the skull [26].
Dr. Rodriguez contends that the parietal bones of the skull he presented
resemble the parietal bones of the Starchild skull. It should be noted that the
parietals on Dr. Rodriguez's skull do exhibit definite bossing (expansion).
However, it is clear the shape of this bossing does not truly resemble the
bossing of SC's parietals. The most notable
feature of SC's bossing is the dent that runs down the middle of the skull,
along the saggital suture [27], giving the skull a "heart-shaped" appearance (as
can be seen in the outlined image below). This is not present on PB, which apart
from the parietal bossing, exhibits the normal rounded shape of a typical human
skull. SC's sutures were healthy and growing at the time of death [28], showing
no indication deformity, or artificial cranial shaping (head binding) [29].
Same view as above with the outlines of the tops of both skulls highlighted
and the parietals tinted blue.
The view above highlights the difference in the shape of the parietals (shown in blue).

Side view of Starchild (left) and skull with parietal bossing (right), with a
cylindrical film canister between the two to hold the Starchild upright.
This
side view again shows the parietal bossing evident in both skulls. However,
while PB's parietals extend downward in a typical, though exaggerated, curve,
SC's parietals slope steeply inwards and attach to a greatly flattened occipital
that slopes steeply inward toward the neck [30]. This sloping occipital is one
of SC's most noticeable features, while PB has an occipital only slightly
different from normal to accommodate the bulging parietals, but still conforming
the the standard shape expected of an occipital bone. With the exception of the
parietal bossing, PB appears to be typical of normal, healthy human skulls in
all respects. Compare to the normal human skull shown right. SC, however, is
atypical in almost all respects [31]. This is more clearly evident in the
outlined view below.
Same view as above with the outlines of the skulls highlighted.
This is the same view as above, with the parietal and occipital silhouettes outlined. PB has very close to a normal outline, as opposed to SC's, which is greatly abnormal. One of the most obvious differences in the skulls is the inion. Also called the "occipital protuberance," this is the boney lump present at the back of all human skulls, to which the neck muscles attach [32]. While PB has a normal inion, SC has none whatsoever. More accurately, where SC's inion should be, there is actually what Dr. Robinson described as a "slight fossa," or small depression in the bone [33]. This has no corollary in medical or scientific history that the Starchild Project team or any expert yet consulted has been aware of [34].
Underside view of Starchild (left) and skull with parietal bossing (right).
This view from the underside of both skulls again shows the extreme shallowness of SC's orbits, and the disparate widths of the skulls. Note the slightly ovular hole in the base of each skull: this is the foramen magnum, where the spine and associated nerves and vessels attach to the skull [35]. SC's hole is much larger due to a piece of bone (the basilar part of the occipital-pars basilaris [36]) being broken off, however, the original shape and size of the aperture is still apparent. From examinations of the foramen magnum and the fossa (indents in the bone) showing where and how the neck muscles attach, it was possible for Dr. Robinson and his team to estimate that SC's neck would have been about half normal thickness, and positioned in an unusual way underneath the center-point of the skull. [37] In comparison, Dr. Rodriguez's skull has a normal foramen magnum and fossa, indicating a normal neck circumference and position.
Underside view of Starchild (left) and skull with parietal bossing (right),
with the green lines showing the top and bottom extremities of the foramen
magnums, and the red arrows indicating distance from the back of the foramen
magnum to the back of the skull.
The image above shows the foramen magnums of the two skulls lined up between the green lines. The distance between the base of the foramen magnum and the back of the skull on SC, and the same measurement on PB is significant. The steep inward slope of SC's occipital has dramatically changed the shape of the rear of the skull, resulting in a much shorter distance from foramen magnum to rear and a highly unusual overall shape. This is opposed to PB, which exhibits a normal distance from foramen magnum to rear, and with the exception of the expanded parietals, a typical skull shape.
Conclusion
While we respect Dr. Rodriguez's professional opinion, it is clear from the evidence above that the parietal bossing of the skull he presented does not truly resemble the parietal bossing evident in the Starchild, and in no way explains or accounts for the other abnormal aspects of the skull.
In addition to these externally visible abnormalities, the Starchild has no frontal sinuses [38], inner ears noticeably larger than normal [39], bone substantially more durable than normal human bone [40], and the bone itself contains strange fibers and a reddish residue that appear to be unique in scientific history [50]. No expert yet consulted has been able to explain the totality of the Starchild's abnormality. Various experts, including Dr. Rodriguez, have suggested conditions and deformities that have similarities to one or two of the features of the Starchild, but those suggestions are invariably proven not to be the case, and even if it were possible to explain one of the skull's abnormalities, a long list of others remains unanswered. In short, to say the existence of other skulls with one or two features similar to the Starchild explains and dismisses the entire mystery is like finding a stripe on an elephant and calling it a zebra.
References
1. National Geographic Channel, "Ancient Astronauts," Is It Real? (documentary series), aired National Geographic Channel 27 November 2006.
2. Ted Robinson[a], “A
Preliminary Analysis of a Highly Unusual Human-Like Skull,”
StarchildProject, 25 Sept 2004, 3.
<http://www.starchildproject.com/Reports_Robinson.html> (Nov 17 2006)
3. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 10.
4. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 3.
5. Ibid.
6. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 16.
7. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 10.
8. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 16.
9. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 12.
10. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 6.
11. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 14.
12. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 15.
13. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 4.
14. Gray, Henry, "5c. The Exterior of the
Skull," Anatomy of the Human Body, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1918;
Bartleby.com, 2000.
<www.bartleby.com/107/46.html/>
15. Gray, Henry, "5a. 6. Ethmoid bone,"
Anatomy of the Human Body, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1918; Bartleby.com,
2000.
<www.bartleby.com/107/36.html/>
16. Gray, Henry, "5a. 5. The Sphenoid
bone," Anatomy of the Human Body, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1918;
Bartleby.com, 2000.
<www.bartleby.com/107/35.html/>
17. Wikipedia, "Human
Skull," Wikipedia, 25 Nov 2006, para 2.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skull#Craniometry_and_morphology_of_human_skulls>
18. Gray, Henry, "5. The Skull," Anatomy of
the Human Body, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1918; Bartleby.com, 2000.
<www.bartleby.com/107/30.html/>
19. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 10.
20. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 3.
21. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 16.
22. Ibid.
23. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 11-12.
24. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 16.
25. Gray, Henry, "5a. 3. The Frontal Bone," Anatomy of the Human Body, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1918;
Bartleby.com, 2000.
<www.bartleby.com/107/33.html/>
26. Gray, Henry, "5c. The Exterior of the Skull:
Norma Verticalis.," Anatomy of the Human Body, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1918;
Bartleby.com, 2000.
<www.bartleby.com/107/46.html/>
27. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 14.
28. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 6.
29. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 14.
30. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 15.
31. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 4.
32. Gray, Henry, "5a. The Cranial Bones. 1.
The Occipital Bone," Anatomy of the Human Body, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1918;
Bartleby.com, 2000.
<www.bartleby.com/107/31.html/>
33. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 15.
34. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 4.
35. Gray, Henry, "5a. The Cranial Bones. 1. The Occipital Bone," (online).
36. Ibid.
37. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 15.
38. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 16.
39. Ted Robinson, “Preliminary Analysis,” 15.
40.Lloyd Pye, “Starchild:
Fibers and Residue” (slideshow presentation), StarchildProject,
slide2.
<http://www.starchildproject.com/fibers_and_residue.swf> (Nov 17 2006)
50.Lloyd Pye, “Starchild:
Fibers and Residue” (slideshow presentation), StarchildProject.
<http://www.starchildproject.com/fibers_and_residue.swf> (Nov 17 2006)
--------
a. Dr. Ted Robinson, M.D., LMCC, FRCS (c), Vancouver, B.C.
All Original Material Copyright
1999-2006
© Lloyd Pye
For information about Lloyd Pye and his books,
Please visit:
www.lloydpye.com