STARCHILD UPDATE
Corrections for the Documentary "Mystery of the Skulls"
I have just finished watching “Mystery of the Skulls.” It leaves several misperceptions. The Starchild is not like the Peruvian skulls. It was not found in Peru, it was found in Mexico. The Peruvian skulls all have normal eye sockets; the Starchild does not. The Peruvian skulls have normal or perhaps above normal bone thickness; the Starchild skull is uniformly 40% as thick as normal human bone. The larger Peruvian skulls, the “coneheads,” average twice as much brain capacity as normal humans, and have a external cranial size reflective of that. Externally the Starchild is the size of a small human or a normal 12-year-old, however it has significantly more brain capacity than normal due to the abnormal shape and thickness of the bone, the shallowness of the eye sockets, and the absence of frontal sinuses. Last but not least, Dr. David Sweet cannot legitimately assert that finding an X and Y chromosome in the Starchild makes it definitively human. For an explanation, see below: “What About The Forensic DNA Testing?”
These are the final sentences
of the conclusion of Dr. Sweet's final written report to me (Click
HERE to
read the full report):
"This means there is a certain detectable amount of human DNA in the
Starchild. It does not guarantee there is only human DNA present, nor does
it indicate there is anything other than human DNA present. In other words,
human-specific probes are indicative but cannot be definitive. They can imply
or suggest innate humanity, but they cannot prove it beyond doubt"
This is precisely the OPPOSITE of what he said at the conclusion of the Starchild
segment on "Mystery of the Skulls."
Click to return to previous page
All Original Material Copyright
1998-2006
© Lloyd Pye
For information about Lloyd Pye and his books,
Please visit:
www.lloydpye.com