March
30, 2010
Most of you have noticed
the media frenzy about "X Woman" or "Lady X,"
the supposedly "new human type" whose mitochondrial DNA
(mtDNA) was found to be significantly different from
human DNA and also Neanderthal DNA. This has provided
quite a shock to mainstream science, as all news reports
and articles about it make clear. However, it also
provides a tremendous boost to the Starchild's DNA
analysis. If you haven't yet heard about it, check here:
To me, a far more logical answer is
that the fingertip came from a hair-covered hominoid
rather than an early human type. Unfortunately, no
matter how logical such a connection might be, science
will never accept its consideration. The same holds true
with Hobbits, which are unmistakable examples of the
pygmy hominoids found in jungles around the equator, but
which science refuses to consider as anything other than
some abberrant type of primitive human. All such
foolishness by science results from a continual game of
intellectual domination its members feel compelled to
play and win at all costs.
If any of you want to know more
about the hominoid possibilities, check Loren Coleman's
analysis at:
www.cryptomundo.com.
Relative to the Starchild,
the question I keep getting is whether the Lady X
discovery will help or hurt our cause. Without doubt it
will help, enormously, because all of
the mtDNA in question represents mutations in strings of
base pairs (nucleotides) that are common to all three
species: Lady X, Neanderthal, and human. In other words,
all three are Earth-bound species.
The new Starchild findings are from
its nuclear DNA (nuDNA), found in the nucleii of its
cells, which is quite different from mtDNA, found
floating freely outside the nucleus in each cell's
cytoplasm. It compares apples and oranges. However, what
is critical about the Starchild discovery is that some
of its nuclear DNA is human, but some is not
found on Earth at all!!!
A story as sensational and
potentially historic as that should be dwarfing Lady X.
We should be getting press inquiries, calls from Oprah,
Larry King, and "60 Minutes," etc. But are we? No! Why
not? Because if what we say is true, it will upend some
heavily entrenched status quos in ways their members
don't want to think about. That's fine with us for now.
Our geneticist must still duplicate his results several
times over so nobody can successfully challenge his work
when he is finally prepared to step onto the world stage
and make history.
My last Byte was about my
Coast to Coast interview last Thursday.
I was given, and so I could only
give you, extremely short notice, so I'm sure most of
you missed hearing it live. However, below are two links
to it. The first is only 34 minutes, which is nothing
but me speaking with host George Noory, straight
through. You have to download that onto your hard drive
before listening.
The second link is a standard
YouTube audio that doesn't require a download, but it is
broken up into the the usual 10-minute segments. If you
listen to that one, the first five minutes or so is
George reading a newscast, the last item of which
discusses "Lady X," which provides the seque into my
interview.
Note: The "Check
The Evidence" website about is run by my good friend
Andrew Johnson in England. Anyone with an interest in
9-11 and with doubts about the "official" story would be
well-served by a visit to Andrew's site. It is one of
the most comprehensive on the internet, and it provides
a provocative alternative theory to what might actually
have happened. His work is only for those with an
interest in the subject, and an open mind about
alternative possibilities.
Lloyd Pye
March
18, 2010
We finally have a recovery
of nuclear DNA from the Starchild!
This past weekend I met with
the geneticist working on the Starchild's DNA. He
explained how he can now prove the Starchild is not
entirely human, which has been our position for
years. Now it is no longer a question of "if," but
of "when" and "how" we spread this astounding new
reality beyond the mailing list. First, though, let
me bring the list's newcomers up to speed.
In 2003 we had a DNA analysis
that used human-only primers to recover the
Starchild's mitochondrial DNA, the DNA outside the
nucleus, which comes from the mother and her genetic
line. That meant its mother was human. But we could
not recover its nuclear DNA, which comes from both
mother and father, which meant its father
was not a human. Unfortunately, with the
recovery technology of 2003 we couldn't prove what
he was, which left us in scientific limbo.
The "no result" from the search for the nuclear DNA
clearly meant Dad wasn't human, but we could not
prove that fact beyond all possible doubt.
Now, in 2010, there have been
many improvements in the recovery process, and those
improvements have been applied to the Starchild
skull with the stunning result you see below. This
is a gel sheet that shows a clear recovery of its
nuclear DNA, which could not be done in 2003.
The next two screen shots are
taken from the national genetic database at the
National Institute of Health, NIH. That
public-access database is a centralized repository
of all genetic information generated by geneticists
all over the world, and now covers essentially all
living organisms on Earth,
from various kinds of viruses and bacteria, to
various kinds of crustaceans and fish, to all kinds
of animals and plants, including great apes and
humans.
For many
species, humans included, there are already
nucleotide sequences covering entire genomes.
Therefore, sequences from the Starchild's DNA can be
directly compared against this vast database to look
for any matches. In one such comparison below, you
see the text below the blue line at the bottom (if
you can read it, sorry it's so fuzzy) that 265 base
pairs (a good length) of recovered Starchild nuclear
DNA matches perfectly with a gene on human
chromosome 1. This verifies beyond any degree of
doubt that some of the nuclear DNA seen in the gel
sheet is from a human being.
In the one below, and again at
the bottom, you see the stunning report that in a
string of 342 base pairs (another good length), "No
significant similarity (is) found." To recover a
stretch of base pairs as long as that with NO
reference in the NIH database is astounding because
it means there is no known earthly corollary for
what has been analyzed! This incredible anomaly will
put the Starchild in history books!!!
Please understand that this
result has now been verified several times, and a
few more different fragments have been identified
that cannot be matched in this database to anything
known. Despite that fact, mainstream skeptics will
be obligated by their positions to try to say it's
some kind of gibberish or some kind of mistake
because in their world view it simply can't be true.
Luckily, their bleating
protests can be easily overcome with continued
repetition of the result, finding more and more
similar fragments in the library that will be
created from the Starchild's DNA, which is what the
geneticist is confident will happen over the next
weeks and months---nothing but verification that a
significant part of the Starchild's genome is not
found on Earth.
I should add that I still can't
reveal the name of the geneticist or where he works
until we are ready to formally present his results
to the world. However, trust me, he is a
well-established professional and his facility is
large and very credible. They don't want to be
bombarded by media until they are prepared for it,
and neither do I for that matter. Just know that you
are a part of the "inner circle" of those who have
put your faith in a dream that is now coming true.
Two more issues of
importance:
(1) I still don't know where
the recent "MonsterQuest" episode "Lizard Monster"
can be viewed on the internet by people outside the
U.S. If anyone knows how that can be found, please
let me know and I'll share with the list. Thanks!
(2) The expenses for materials
doing our research has now outstripped the amount
donated by the list. It is now coming out of my
pocket and I could use some help to bridge that gap.
However, look on the bright side. This should be the
last time I ever have to ask for your help in this
way. ;-)
